legnum/galant boost cut

[evonut270]

can anyone help find the boost cut location?

[AndyF]

Try the table at 114A6 with 12 columns although I'm not 100% on that one as it's purely from map 'matching' with the E6 ROM rather than a full on disassembly etc...

Andy

[evonut270]

Try the table at 114A6 with 12 columns although I'm not 100% on that one as it's purely from map 'matching' with the E6 ROM rather than a full on disassembly etc...

Andy

I had tried a few others addresses by using the same method andy but to no avail so far. Don't think this is one iv tried there are a few 2d maps ranging from 120 up to 220 but until I get some feedback from the folks testing I can't be sure what load cut happens at I doubt it's as low as 120 though

[todd]

e mail to you john

[bitsuMishi]

Found these by process of elimination of a tuned rom:

<table name="Boost/Load limit A" category="Boost Control"114a6" type="2D" scaling="LoadBoost">
<table name="RPM" address="2CD06" type="Y Axis" elements="12" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>

<table name="Boost/Load limit B" category="Control" address="114b6" type="2D" scaling="LoadBoost">
<table name="RPM" address="2CD06" type="Y Axis" elements="12" scaling="RPM"/>

Have confirmed and tested boost cut is completely removed up to ~15psi by setting all numbers in both tables to 210. Don't know why there are two identical tables yet - I have yet to try adjusting one alone to see if both are required.

RPM axis match in size and header memory addresses - but I don't do dissassembly so can't confirm these are exactly the right axis.

[evonut270]

Found these by process of elimination of a tuned rom:

<table name="Boost/Load limit A" category="Boost Control"114a6" type="2D" scaling="LoadBoost">
<table name="RPM" address="2CD06" type="Y Axis" elements="12" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>

<table name="Boost/Load limit B" category="Control" address="114b6" type="2D" scaling="LoadBoost">
<table name="RPM" address="2CD06" type="Y Axis" elements="12" scaling="RPM"/>

Have confirmed and tested boost cut is completely removed up to ~15psi by setting all numbers in both tables to 210. Don't know why there are two identical tables yet - I have yet to try adjusting one alone to see if both are required.

RPM axis match in size and header memory addresses - but I don't do dissassembly so can't confirm these are exactly the right axis.At what load did boost cut originally occur? I will try to get someone to test this.

[evonut270]

Ok seems 114a6 is for auto cars and 114b6 is for manual cars

[Shtiv]

I heard there are two tables, one of which is 1153c, the other I guess are the ones you guys are talking about

[Shtiv]

Just checked it, you need both addresses changed, the 114's and 1153c.

[evonut270]

Have you tested this?

[Shtiv]

Haven't tried without 1153c active yet (tomorrows task) but it seemed to make some sort of difference with it changed but still hit the cut at other times. With all three changed, boost cut is gone.

It would be odd to have 2 addresses though so i'm doubtful that 1153c is axactly that, maybe it's something else that masks the cut a bit.

[ninjadaniel]

boost cut is a horrible thing to test- almost like having a mate test a new sports cup for you haha

[Shtiv]

With 114a6 and 114b6 raised, 1153c set down to 140 I cannot hit boost cut, and I was getting loads spiking over 200 and over 170 for 15secs, pretty sure you dont need 1153c after that. so i have changed 1153c back to stock as I have no idea what it does.